Xeon L5410 vs A8-3500M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-3500M
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.88

Xeon L5410 outperforms A8-3500M by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-3500M and Xeon L5410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25612335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency2.382.31
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)no data
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-3500M and Xeon L5410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.33 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHzno data
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data57 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on A8-3500M and Xeon L5410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3500M and Xeon L5410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620Gno data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

A8-3500M and Xeon L5410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3500M and Xeon L5410 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3500M and Xeon L5410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6620G (444 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-3500M 0.88
Xeon L5410 1.22
+38.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-3500M 1400
Xeon L5410 1940
+38.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.88 1.22
Recency 14 June 2011 1 January 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

A8-3500M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon L5410, on the other hand, has a 38.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The Xeon L5410 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-3500M in performance tests.

Be aware that A8-3500M is a notebook processor while Xeon L5410 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3500M and Xeon L5410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3500M
A8-3500M
Intel Xeon L5410
Xeon L5410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 118 votes

Rate A8-3500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 67 votes

Rate Xeon L5410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3500M or Xeon L5410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.