A6-9500E vs Celeron G1630

General info

Comparing Celeron G1630 and A6-9500E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2272	2261
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.09	7.95
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date	1 September 2013 (10 years ago)	27 July 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$80	no data
Current price	$110 (1.4x MSRP)	$32

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

A6-9500E has 8733% better value for money than Celeron G1630.

Technical specs

Celeron G1630 and A6-9500E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	2.8 GHz	3 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.8 GHz	3.4 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	no data
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	1024 KB
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	0 KB
Chip lithography	22 nm	28 nm
Die size	94 mm2	246 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	65 °C	74 °C
Number of transistors	no data	1,178 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1630 and A6-9500E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA1155	AM4
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1630 and A6-9500E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	-	+
FMA	no data	+
AVX	+	+
FRTC	no data	1
FreeSync	no data	1
PowerTune	no data	+
TrueAudio	no data	+
PowerNow	no data	+
PowerGating	no data	+
VirusProtect	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
My WiFi	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Celeron G1630 and A6-9500E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	-	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1630 and A6-9500E are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1630 and A6-9500E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size	32 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	21 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core count	no data	4
Enduro	no data	+
UVD	no data	+
VCE	no data	+
Graphics max frequency	1.05 GHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1630 and A6-9500E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
DisplayPort	no data	+
HDMI	no data	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1630 and A6-9500E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	DirectX® 12
Vulkan	no data	1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1630 and A6-9500E.

PCIe version	2.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9500E outperforms Celeron G1630 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Performance score	1.10	1.14
Recency	1 September 2013	27 July 2017
Chip lithography	22 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1630 and A6-9500E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---