Pentium G6951 vs A6-9500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9500
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.18
+35.6%
Pentium G6951
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.87

A6-9500 outperforms Pentium G6951 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9500 and Pentium G6951 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23522550
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.621.12
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.711.12
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)1 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64$94

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A6-9500 has 134% better value for money than Pentium G6951.

Detailed specifications

A6-9500 and Pentium G6951 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C73 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9500 and Pentium G6951 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9500 and Pentium G6951. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+

Security technologies

A6-9500 and Pentium G6951 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9500 and Pentium G6951 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9500 and Pentium G6951. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16.38 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsIntel HD
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9500 and Pentium G6951 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9500 and Pentium G6951 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9500 and Pentium G6951.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9500 1.18
+35.6%
Pentium G6951 0.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9500 1869
+35.1%
Pentium G6951 1383

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 0.87
Recency 27 July 2017 1 September 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 73 Watt

A6-9500 has a 35.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 12.3% lower power consumption.

The A6-9500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G6951 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9500 and Pentium G6951, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9500
A6-9500
Intel Pentium G6951
Pentium G6951

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 184 votes

Rate A6-9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Pentium G6951 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9500 or Pentium G6951, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.