Pentium III 800 vs A6-9225

VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-9225 and Pentium III 800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2565not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency5.29no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Coppermine T (2000)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-9225 and Pentium III 800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads2no data
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz0.8 GHz
L1 cache160 KB8 KB
L2 cache1 MB256 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm180 nm
Die size124.5 mm280 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million44 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9225 and Pentium III 800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA370
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt38 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9225 and Pentium III 800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9225 and Pentium III 800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 38 Watt

A6-9225 has 100% more physical cores, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 153.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A6-9225 and Pentium III 800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A6-9225 is a notebook processor while Pentium III 800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and Pentium III 800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9225
A6-9225
Intel Pentium III  800
Pentium III 800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2289 votes

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 63 votes

Rate Pentium III 800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9225 or Pentium III 800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.