MediaTek Kompanio 520 vs A6-9225

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9225
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.84
MediaTek Kompanio 520
8 cores / 8 threads
1.98
+136%

MediaTek Kompanio 520 outperforms A6-9225 by a whopping 136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9225 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25811940
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeMediaTek Kompanio 500
Power efficiency5.27no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-9225 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache160 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A6-9225 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGAno data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9225 and MediaTek Kompanio 520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9225 and MediaTek Kompanio 520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 686 MHz)no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 1.98
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

MediaTek Kompanio 520 has a 135.7% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The MediaTek Kompanio 520 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9225 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and MediaTek Kompanio 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9225
A6-9225
MediaTek Kompanio 520
Kompanio 520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2299 votes

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 34 votes

Rate MediaTek Kompanio 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9225 or MediaTek Kompanio 520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.