A8-3550MX vs A6-9225

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9225
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.86

A8-3550MX outperforms A6-9225 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9225 and A8-3550MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24622311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)20 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price$451 $221

Detailed specifications

A6-9225 and A8-3550MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache160 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size124.5 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-9225 and A8-3550MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFS1
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9225 and A8-3550MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-2133 RAM (1 channel), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620G, DDR3(L)-1333/1600 Memory Controller
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9225 and A8-3550MX are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9225 and A8-3550MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)AMD Radeon HD 6620G

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9225 0.86
A8-3550MX 1.09
+26.7%

A8-3550MX outperforms A6-9225 by 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-9225 1335
A8-3550MX 1687
+26.4%

A8-3550MX outperforms A6-9225 by 26% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.86 1.09
Integrated graphics card 1.17 0.88
Recency 1 June 2018 20 December 2011
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

The A8-3550MX is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9225 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and A8-3550MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9225
A6-9225
AMD A8-3550MX
A8-3550MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2224 votes

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 24 votes

Rate A8-3550MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9225 or A8-3550MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.