A10-6700 vs A6-9225

Primary details

Comparing A6-9225 and A10-6700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2462	1835
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.43
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	AMD Bristol Ridge	no data
Architecture codename	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Richland (2013−2014)
Release date	1 June 2018 (6 years ago)	1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Current price	$451	$103

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

A6-9225 and A10-6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	2	4
Base clock speed	2.6 GHz	3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.1 GHz	4.3 GHz
L1 cache	160 KB	192 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	4096 KB
L3 cache	no data	0 KB
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Die size	124.5 mm2	246 mm2
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	71 °C
Number of transistors	1200 Million	1,178 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on A6-9225 and A10-6700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	BGA	FM2
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9225 and A10-6700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	DDR4-2133 RAM (1 channel), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND	no data
AES-NI	+	1
FMA	+	FMA4
AVX	+	AVX
PowerTune	no data	-
TrueAudio	no data	-
PowerNow	no data	+
PowerGating	no data	+
Out-of-band client management	no data	-
VirusProtect	no data	+
RAID	no data	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9225 and A10-6700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
IOMMU 2.0	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9225 and A10-6700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4	DDR3-1866
Max memory channels	no data	2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)	AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Number of pipelines	no data	384
Enduro	no data	+
Switchable graphics	no data	1
UVD	no data	+
VCE	no data	+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9225 and A10-6700 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	no data	+
HDMI	no data	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9225 and A10-6700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX

no data

DirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9225 and A10-6700.

PCIe version

no data

2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6700 outperforms A6-9225 by 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.86	2.02
Integrated graphics card	1.17	1.37
Recency	1 June 2018	1 June 2013
Physical cores	2	4
Threads	2	4
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	65 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and A10-6700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---