Atom D525 vs A6-9220

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9220
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.80
+220%
Atom D525
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
0.25

A6-9220 outperforms Atom D525 by a whopping 220% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9220 and Atom D525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26133163
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol RidgeIntel Atom
Power efficiency5.051.82
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$63

Detailed specifications

A6-9220 and Atom D525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cache160 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size124.5 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9220 and Atom D525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9220 and Atom D525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit

Security technologies

A6-9220 and Atom D525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9220 and Atom D525 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9220 and Atom D525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)Intel GMA 3150

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9220 0.80
+220%
Atom D525 0.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9220 1278
+216%
Atom D525 404

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A6-9220 2432
+299%
Atom D525 610

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A6-9220 3941
+131%
Atom D525 1707

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A6-9220 2253
+153%
Atom D525 891

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A6-9220 27.71
+99.4%
Atom D525 55.25

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A6-9220 1
+142%
Atom D525 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 0.25
Integrated graphics card 1.17 0.01
Recency 1 June 2016 21 June 2010
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 13 Watt

A6-9220 has a 220% higher aggregate performance score, 11600% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

Atom D525, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

The A6-9220 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D525 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9220 and Atom D525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9220
A6-9220
Intel Atom D525
Atom D525

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 404 votes

Rate A6-9220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 218 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9220 or Atom D525, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.