Apple M3 Max 14-Core vs A6-9210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9210
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.71
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
2023
14 cores / 14 threads, 78 Watt
20.67
+2811%

M3 Max 14-Core outperforms A6-9210 by a whopping 2811% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2895319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeApple M3
Power efficiency2.0111.28
DesignerAMDApple
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)no data
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)30 October 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-9210 and M3 Max 14-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads214
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.06 GHz
L2 cache1024 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million92000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A6-9210 and M3 Max 14-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4no data
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt78 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9210 and M3 Max 14-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9210 and M3 Max 14-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9210 and M3 Max 14-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 GraphicsApple M3 Max 30-Core GPU
iGPU core count3no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9210 and M3 Max 14-Core integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9210 and M3 Max 14-Core integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9210 and M3 Max 14-Core.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A6-9210 0.71
Apple M3 Max 14-Core 20.67
+2811%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A6-9210 1254
Samples: 49
Apple M3 Max 14-Core 36521
+2812%
Samples: 297

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 20.67
Recency 1 June 2016 30 October 2023
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 2 14
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 78 Watt

A6-9210 has 680% lower power consumption.

Apple M3 Max 14-Core, on the other hand, has a 2811.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M3 Max 14-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-9210 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9210
A6-9210
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
M3 Max 14-Core

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 154 votes

Rate A6-9210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 78 votes

Rate M3 Max 14-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A6-9210 and M3 Max 14-Core, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.