Duo T2250 vs A6-7480
Aggregate performance score
A6-7480 outperforms Core Duo T2250 by a whopping 410% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2684 | 3484 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Core Duo |
| Power efficiency | 2.43 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 26 October 2018 (7 years ago) | May 2006 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A6-7480 and Core Duo T2250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 160K | 0 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 250 mm2 | 90 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 3,100 million | 151 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.7625-1.3V |
Compatibility
Information on A6-7480 and Core Duo T2250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FM2+ | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7480 and Core Duo T2250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
A6-7480 and Core Duo T2250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7480 and Core Duo T2250 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7480 and Core Duo T2250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon R5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7480 and Core Duo T2250.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.02 | 0.20 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 31 Watt |
A6-7480 has a 410% higher aggregate performance score, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.
Duo T2250, on the other hand, has 45.2% lower power consumption.
The AMD A6-7480 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Duo T2250 in performance tests.
Note that A6-7480 is a desktop processor while Core Duo T2250 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
