A4-6300 vs A6-7470K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-7470K
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.13
+25.6%
A4-6300
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.90

A6-7470K outperforms A4-6300 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-7470K and A4-6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23982551
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.651.31
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date2 February 2016 (8 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-7470K and A4-6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache256 KB96 KB
L2 cache1024 KB1024 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size245 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C70 °C
Number of transistors2,411 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A6-7470K and A4-6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7470K and A4-6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX+AVX
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7470K and A4-6300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7470K and A4-6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3-1600
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon™ HD 8370D
iGPU core count4no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์256128
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-7470K and A4-6300 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-7470K and A4-6300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 11
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7470K and A4-6300.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-7470K 1.13
+25.6%
A4-6300 0.90

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-7470K 1799
+26%
A4-6300 1428

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.13 0.90
Recency 2 February 2016 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

A6-7470K has a 25.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The A6-7470K is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-6300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7470K and A4-6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-7470K
A6-7470K
AMD A4-6300
A4-6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate A6-7470K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 285 votes

Rate A4-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-7470K or A4-6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.