E1-1500 vs A6-7400K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-7400K
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.03
+312%
E1-1500
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.25

A6-7400K outperforms E1-1500 by a whopping 312% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-7400K and E1-1500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24533173
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.501.31
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date31 July 2014 (10 years ago)6 January 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-7400K and E1-1500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.48 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm40 nm
Die size245 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C100 °C
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A6-7400K and E1-1500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7400K and E1-1500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow++
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7400K and E1-1500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7400K and E1-1500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 7310
iGPU core count4no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์256no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-7400K and E1-1500 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-7400K and E1-1500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7400K and E1-1500.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-7400K 1.03
+312%
E1-1500 0.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-7400K 1640
+319%
E1-1500 391

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-7400K 398
+269%
E1-1500 108

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-7400K 560
+193%
E1-1500 191

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.03 0.25
Recency 31 July 2014 6 January 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 18 Watt

A6-7400K has a 312% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

E1-1500, on the other hand, has 261.1% lower power consumption.

The A6-7400K is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-1500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7400K and E1-1500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-7400K
A6-7400K
AMD E1-1500
E1-1500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 84 votes

Rate A6-7400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 162 votes

Rate E1-1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-7400K or E1-1500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.