Celeron J1800 vs A6-7400K

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-7400K and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2314not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date31 July 2014 (9 years ago)1 November 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$72
Current price$61 $253 (3.5x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

A6-7400K and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.58 GHz
L1 cache128 KB112 KB
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature70 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-7400K and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7400K and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
HSA1no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
SIPPno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued
RSTno data-

Security technologies

A6-7400K and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Identity Protectionno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7400K and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7400K and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
iGPU core count4no data
Number of pipelines256no data
Quick Sync Videono data+
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
Graphics max frequencyno data792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-7400K and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-7400K and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7400K and Celeron J1800.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-7400K 1623
+184%
Celeron J1800 572

A6-7400K outperforms Celeron J1800 by 184% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 July 2014 1 November 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between A6-7400K and Celeron J1800. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A6-7400K is a desktop processor while Celeron J1800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7400K and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-7400K
A6-7400K
Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 64 votes

Rate A6-7400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 480 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-7400K or Celeron J1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.