Ryzen 9 5900X vs A6-7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-7000
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.65
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
25.33
+3797%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms A6-7000 by a whopping 3797% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-7000 and Ryzen 9 5900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2640174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.60
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD KaveriAMD Ryzen 9
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Vermeer (Zen3) (2020)
Release date1 June 2014 (10 years ago)5 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549
Current price$450 $351 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-7000 and Ryzen 9 5900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data2x 80.7 + 125 (I/O) mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on A6-7000 and Ryzen 9 5900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3AM4
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7000 and Ryzen 9 5900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controller86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
FRTC1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
HSA1no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7000 and Ryzen 9 5900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7000 and Ryzen 9 5900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 Graphics-
iGPU core count3-
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics1-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-7000 and Ryzen 9 5900X integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-7000 and Ryzen 9 5900X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12-
Vulkan1-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7000 and Ryzen 9 5900X.

PCIe version3.04.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-7000 0.65
Ryzen 9 5900X 25.33
+3797%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms A6-7000 by 3797% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-7000 1010
Ryzen 9 5900X 39182
+3779%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms A6-7000 by 3779% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 25.33
Recency 1 June 2014 5 November 2020
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 105 Watt

The Ryzen 9 5900X is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-7000 in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-7000 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 5900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7000 and Ryzen 9 5900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-7000
A6-7000
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate A6-7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 3147 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-7000 or Ryzen 9 5900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.