A6-9500 vs A6-6400K
Aggregate performance score
A6-9500 outperforms A6-6400K by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A6-6400K and A6-9500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2395 | 2242 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.12 | 2.62 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD A-Series (Desktop) | no data |
| Architecture codename | Richland (2013−2014) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 1 June 2013 (11 years ago) | 27 July 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $64 |
| Current price | $80 | $56 (0.9x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
A6-9500 has 2083% better value for money than A6-6400K.
Detailed specifications
A6-6400K and A6-9500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on A6-6400K and A6-9500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FM2 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-6400K and A6-9500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE1-4a, AES, ABM, AVX, BMI1, AMD64, VT, EVP, Turbo Core 3.0 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | FMA4 | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | no data | 1 |
| FreeSync | no data | 1 |
| PowerTune | - | + |
| TrueAudio | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | + |
| PowerGating | + | + |
| Out-of-band client management | - | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-6400K and A6-9500 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-6400K and A6-9500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 8470D | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 6 |
| Number of pipelines | 192 | no data |
| Enduro | + | + |
| Switchable graphics | 1 | no data |
| UVD | + | + |
| VCE | + | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A6-6400K and A6-9500 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | + |
| HDMI | + | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A6-6400K and A6-9500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 11 | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-6400K and A6-9500.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A6-9500 outperforms A6-6400K by 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
A6-9500 outperforms A6-6400K by 26% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
A6-9500 outperforms A6-6400K by 60% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
A6-9500 outperforms A6-6400K by 66% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.97 | 1.21 |
| Recency | 1 June 2013 | 27 July 2017 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
The A6-9500 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-6400K in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-6400K and A6-9500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
