A4-9125 SoC vs A6-6400K
Primary details
Comparing A6-6400K and A4-9125 SoC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2503 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | AMD A-Series (Desktop) | no data |
Power efficiency | 1.38 | no data |
Architecture codename | Richland (2013−2014) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
Release date | 1 June 2013 (11 years ago) | April 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A6-6400K and A4-9125 SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
L1 cache | 96 KB | 160 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 246 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 1,200 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on A6-6400K and A4-9125 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FM2 | FT4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-6400K and A4-9125 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE1-4a, AES, ABM, AVX, BMI1, AMD64, VT, EVP, Turbo Core 3.0 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | FMA4 | + |
AVX | + | + |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-6400K and A4-9125 SoC are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-6400K and A4-9125 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR4 |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 8470D | Radeon R3 2CU |
Number of pipelines | 192 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A6-6400K and A4-9125 SoC integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A6-6400K and A4-9125 SoC integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 11 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-6400K and A4-9125 SoC.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
A4-9125 SoC has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A6-6400K and A4-9125 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that A6-6400K is a desktop processor while A4-9125 SoC is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-6400K and A4-9125 SoC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.