Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U vs A6-6310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-6310
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.08
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.83
+347%

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms A6-6310 by a whopping 347% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-6310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking23171187
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Picasso (2019−2020)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)8 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$302 $619

Detailed specifications

A6-6310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4 GHz
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm12 nm
Die size107 mm2209.78 mm2
Number of transistors930 Million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-6310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT3bFP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-6310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1866XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4no data
AVX++
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-6310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-6310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1865DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-6310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-6310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-6310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-6310 1.08
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 4.83
+347%

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms A6-6310 by 347% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-6310 1672
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 7469
+347%

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms A6-6310 by 347% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-6310 226
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 956
+323%

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms A6-6310 by 323% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-6310 594
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 3079
+418%

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms A6-6310 by 418% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A6-6310 157
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 658
+319%

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms A6-6310 by 319% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A6-6310 47
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 149
+217%

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms A6-6310 by 217% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.08 4.83
Recency 29 April 2014 8 April 2019
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-6310 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-6310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-6310
A6-6310
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 225 votes

Rate A6-6310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 126 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-6310 or Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.