A4-7210 vs A6-6310

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A6-6310
2014
4 cores / 4 threads
1.08
+0.9%

A6-6310 outperforms A4-7210 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing A6-6310 and A4-7210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22842288
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Carrizo-L (2015)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)7 May 2015 (8 years ago)
Current price$302 $177

Detailed Specifications

A6-6310 and A4-7210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB2048 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors930 Million930 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-6310 and A4-7210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT3bFT3b
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt12-25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-6310 and A4-7210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1866MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4FMA4
AVX++
PowerTune--
TrueAudio--
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management--
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-6310 and A4-7210 are enumerated here.

AMD-V11
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-6310 and A4-7210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1865DDR3L-1600
Max memory channels11

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 GraphicsAMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Enduro++
Switchable graphics11
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-6310 and A4-7210 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-6310 and A4-7210 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-6310 and A4-7210.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-6310 1.08
+0.9%
A4-7210 1.07

A6-6310 outperforms A4-7210 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-6310 1669
+0.5%
A4-7210 1661

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-6310 227
+6.1%
A4-7210 214

A6-6310 outperforms A4-7210 by 6% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-6310 595
+1.2%
A4-7210 588

A6-6310 outperforms A4-7210 by 1% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A6-6310 1829
+5.6%
A4-7210 1732

A6-6310 outperforms A4-7210 by 6% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A6-6310 5612
+0.3%
A4-7210 5593

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A6-6310 2730
+1.8%
A4-7210 2681

A6-6310 outperforms A4-7210 by 2% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A6-6310 26.64
+1.1%
A4-7210 26.94

A4-7210 outperforms A6-6310 by 1% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A6-6310 2
A4-7210 2
+0.5%

A4-7210 outperforms A6-6310 by 1% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A6-6310 157
A4-7210 157

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A6-6310 47
+2.2%
A4-7210 46

A6-6310 outperforms A4-7210 by 2% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A6-6310 0.57
+1.8%
A4-7210 0.56

A6-6310 outperforms A4-7210 by 2% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6-6310 1.2
A4-7210 1.2

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6-6310 1247
+0.9%
A4-7210 1236

A6-6310 outperforms A4-7210 by 1% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6-6310 52
+1.8%
A4-7210 51

A6-6310 outperforms A4-7210 by 2% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6-6310 11
+1.8%
A4-7210 11

A6-6310 outperforms A4-7210 by 2% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A6-6310 1233
+2.2%
A4-7210 1207

A6-6310 outperforms A4-7210 by 2% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A6-6310 3549
+0.7%
A4-7210 3524

A6-6310 outperforms A4-7210 by 1% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.08 1.07
Recency 29 April 2014 7 May 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 12 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-6310 and A4-7210.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-6310 and A4-7210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-6310
A6-6310
AMD A4-7210
A4-7210

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 220 votes

Rate A6-6310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 136 votes

Rate A4-7210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about A6-6310 or A4-7210, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.