Xeon Gold 5320H vs A6-5400K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-5400K
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.73
Xeon Gold 5320H
2021
20 cores / 40 threads, 150 Watt
17.99
+2364%

Xeon Gold 5320H outperforms A6-5400K by a whopping 2364% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2899393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.2012.85
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Cooper Lake-SP (2021)
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)6 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-5400K and Xeon Gold 5320H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads240
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB27.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A6-5400K and Xeon Gold 5320H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14
SocketFM2FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5400K and Xeon Gold 5320H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A6-5400K and Xeon Gold 5320H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5400K and Xeon Gold 5320H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5400K and Xeon Gold 5320H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 RDIMM
Maximum memory sizeno data1.12 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 7540Dno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5400K and Xeon Gold 5320H.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A6-5400K 0.73
Xeon Gold 5320H 17.99
+2364%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A6-5400K 1282
Samples: 634
Xeon Gold 5320H 31718
+2374%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 17.99
Recency 2 October 2012 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 40
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt

A6-5400K has 130.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5320H, on the other hand, has a 2364.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Gold 5320H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-5400K in performance tests.

Note that A6-5400K is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 5320H is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5400K
A6-5400K
Intel Xeon Gold 5320H
Xeon Gold 5320H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 186 votes

Rate A6-5400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5320H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A6-5400K and Xeon Gold 5320H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.