Pentium E6500 vs A6-5400K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-5400K
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.80
+9.6%
Pentium E6500
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.73

A6-5400K outperforms Pentium E6500 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-5400K and Pentium E6500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26172687
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.74
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.161.06
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)9 August 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-5400K and Pentium E6500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz0.93 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V – 1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on A6-5400K and Pentium E6500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5400K and Pentium E6500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

A6-5400K and Pentium E6500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5400K and Pentium E6500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5400K and Pentium E6500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 7540DOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5400K and Pentium E6500.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-5400K 0.80
+9.6%
Pentium E6500 0.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-5400K 1275
+9.8%
Pentium E6500 1161

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-5400K 383
+13%
Pentium E6500 339

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-5400K 516
Pentium E6500 552
+7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 0.73
Recency 2 October 2012 9 August 2009
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

A6-5400K has a 9.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-5400K and Pentium E6500.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-5400K and Pentium E6500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5400K
A6-5400K
Intel Pentium E6500
Pentium E6500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 166 votes

Rate A6-5400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 264 votes

Rate Pentium E6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-5400K or Pentium E6500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.