A4-5050 vs A6-5400K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-5400K
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.80
A4-5050
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.84
+5%

A4-5050 outperforms A6-5400K by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-5400K and A4-5050 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25982573
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.165.30
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 February 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-5400K and A4-5050 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A6-5400K and A4-5050 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FT3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5400K and A4-5050. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5400K and A4-5050 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5400K and A4-5050. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 7540DAMD Radeon HD 8330

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-5400K 0.80
A4-5050 0.84
+5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-5400K 1275
A4-5050 1328
+4.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 0.84
Recency 2 October 2012 1 February 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

A4-5050 has a 5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-5400K and A4-5050.

Note that A6-5400K is a desktop processor while A4-5050 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-5400K and A4-5050, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5400K
A6-5400K
AMD A4-5050
A4-5050

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 163 votes

Rate A6-5400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate A4-5050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-5400K or A4-5050, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.