A12-9720P vs A6-5400K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-5400K
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.82

A12-9720P outperforms A6-5400K by a whopping 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-5400K and A12-9720P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24981954
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date2 October 2012 (11 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Current price$163 $502

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-5400K and A12-9720P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-5400K and A12-9720P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2FP4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5400K and A12-9720P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-1866 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5400K and A12-9720P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5400K and A12-9720P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 7540DAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-5400K 0.82
A12-9720P 1.72
+110%

A12-9720P outperforms A6-5400K by 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-5400K 1262
A12-9720P 2662
+111%

A12-9720P outperforms A6-5400K by 111% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-5400K 387
A12-9720P 523
+35.1%

A12-9720P outperforms A6-5400K by 35% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-5400K 522
A12-9720P 1176
+125%

A12-9720P outperforms A6-5400K by 125% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.82 1.72
Recency 2 October 2012 1 June 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

The A12-9720P is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-5400K in performance tests.

Note that A6-5400K is a desktop processor while A12-9720P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-5400K and A12-9720P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5400K
A6-5400K
AMD A12-9720P
A12-9720P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 161 vote

Rate A6-5400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 427 votes

Rate A12-9720P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-5400K or A12-9720P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.