Turion II P520 vs A6-5400B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-5400B
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.84
+68%

A6-5400B outperforms Turion II P520 by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28453176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Turion II
Power efficiency0.550.84
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)12 May 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-5400B and Turion II P520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rateno data3600 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-5400B and Turion II P520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2S1 (S1g4)
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5400B and Turion II P520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5400B and Turion II P520 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5400B and Turion II P520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 7540Dno data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A6-5400B 0.84
+68%
Turion II P520 0.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A6-5400B 1465
+68.4%
Samples: 68
Turion II P520 870
Samples: 124

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-5400B 344
+19%
Turion II P520 289

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-5400B 475
Turion II P520 522
+9.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 0.50
Recency 2 October 2012 12 May 2010
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 25 Watt

A6-5400B has a 68% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Turion II P520, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.

The AMD A6-5400B is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion II P520 in performance tests.

Note that A6-5400B is a desktop processor while Turion II P520 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5400B
A6-5400B
AMD Turion II P520
Turion II P520

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 65 votes

Rate A6-5400B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 52 votes

Rate Turion II P520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A6-5400B and Turion II P520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.