Xeon X3480 vs A6-5350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-5350M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.69
Xeon X3480
2010, $612
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.91
+177%

Xeon X3480 outperforms A6-5350M by a whopping 177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29862197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.09
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency0.830.85
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Release date1 June 2013 (12 years ago)30 May 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$612

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of A6-5350M and Xeon X3480: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.06 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.73 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2296 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °C73 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-5350M and Xeon X3480 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5350M and Xeon X3480. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data36 Bit

Security technologies

A6-5350M and Xeon X3480 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5350M and Xeon X3480 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5350M and Xeon X3480. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8450GN/A
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-5350M and Xeon X3480 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-5350M and Xeon X3480 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5350M and Xeon X3480.

PCIe versionNot Listed2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A6-5350M 0.69
Xeon X3480 1.91
+177%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A6-5350M 1207
Samples: 139
Xeon X3480 3335
+176%
Samples: 72

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 1.91
Recency 1 June 2013 30 May 2010
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

A6-5350M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 41% more advanced lithography process, and 171% lower power consumption.

Xeon X3480, on the other hand, has a 177% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Intel Xeon X3480 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-5350M in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-5350M is a notebook processor while Xeon X3480 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 29 votes

Rate A6-5350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 172 votes

Rate Xeon X3480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A6-5350M and Xeon X3480, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.