Ryzen 3 210 vs A6-5350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-5350M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.68

Ryzen 3 210 outperforms A6-5350M by a whopping 1004% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29081084
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency0.8211.34
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Release date1 June 2013 (12 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-5350M and Ryzen 3 210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size246 mm2137 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million20,900 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A6-5350M and Ryzen 3 210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5350M and Ryzen 3 210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAAES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5350M and Ryzen 3 210 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5350M and Ryzen 3 210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8450GAMD Radeon 740M
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-5350M and Ryzen 3 210 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-5350M and Ryzen 3 210 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5350M and Ryzen 3 210.

PCIe versionNot Listed4.0
PCI Express lanesno data14

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A6-5350M 0.68
Ryzen 3 210 7.51
+1004%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A6-5350M 1199
Samples: 138
Ryzen 3 210 13199
+1001%
Samples: 37

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 7.51
Integrated graphics card 0.75 6.97
Recency 1 June 2013 6 January 2025
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 3 210 has a 1004.4% higher aggregate performance score, 829.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 3 210 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-5350M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5350M
A6-5350M
AMD Ryzen 3 210
Ryzen 3 210

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 29 votes

Rate A6-5350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A6-5350M and Ryzen 3 210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.