Celeron N4020C vs A6-5350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-5350M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.79

Celeron N4020C outperforms A6-5350M by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-5350M and Celeron N4020C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25302389
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)no data
Release date12 March 2013 (11 years ago)1 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$61 no data

Detailed specifications

A6-5350M and Celeron N4020C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speed2.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHzno data
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-5350M and Celeron N4020C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5350M and Celeron N4020C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controllerno data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5350M and Celeron N4020C are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5350M and Celeron N4020C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8450Gno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5350M and Celeron N4020C.

PCI Express lanesno data6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-5350M 0.79
Celeron N4020C 0.98
+24.1%

Celeron N4020C outperforms A6-5350M by 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-5350M 1224
Celeron N4020C 1520
+24.2%

Celeron N4020C outperforms A6-5350M by 24% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 0.98
Recency 12 March 2013 1 January 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron N4020C has a 24.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N4020C is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-5350M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-5350M and Celeron N4020C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5350M
A6-5350M
Intel Celeron N4020C
Celeron N4020C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 23 votes

Rate A6-5350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 85 votes

Rate Celeron N4020C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-5350M or Celeron N4020C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.