A9-9420e vs A6-5350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-5350M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.68
+9.7%

A6-5350M outperforms A9-9420e by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29463007
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency2.08no data
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 June 2013 (12 years ago)1 June 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-5350M and A9-9420e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.5 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-5350M and A9-9420e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1r2BGA
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt1 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5350M and A9-9420e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAVirtualization,
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5350M and A9-9420e are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5350M and A9-9420e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR4
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8450GAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-5350M and A9-9420e integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-5350M and A9-9420e integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5350M and A9-9420e.

PCIe versionNot Listedno data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A6-5350M 0.68
+9.7%
A9-9420e 0.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A6-5350M 1199
+8.9%
Samples: 138
A9-9420e 1101
Samples: 102

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

A6-5350M 118
+21.1%
A9-9420e 97

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 0.62
Integrated graphics card 0.80 1.33
Recency 1 June 2013 1 June 2018
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 1 Watt

A6-5350M has a 9.7% higher aggregate performance score.

A9-9420e, on the other hand, has 66.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 3400% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD A6-5350M and AMD A9-9420e.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5350M
A6-5350M
AMD A9-9420e
A9-9420e

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 29 votes

Rate A6-5350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 153 votes

Rate A9-9420e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A6-5350M and A9-9420e, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.