Ultra 7 270K Plus vs A6-5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2765not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency1.60no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Arrow Lake Refresh (2026)
Release date23 May 2013 (13 years ago)11 March 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of A6-5200 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache256 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die size246 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A6-5200 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT31851
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5200 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
SIPP-+

Security technologies

A6-5200 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5200 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5200 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8400Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
จำนวนพาธไลน์128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-5200 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-5200 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5200 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A6-5200 1661
Samples: 981
Ultra 7 270K Plus 68889
+4047%
Samples: 552

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A6-5200 1598
Ultra 7 270K Plus 12623
+690%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A6-5200 5600
Ultra 7 270K Plus 102789
+1736%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A6-5200 26.1
Ultra 7 270K Plus 2.33
+1020%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

A6-5200 156
Ultra 7 270K Plus 6656
+4167%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

A6-5200 42
Ultra 7 270K Plus 354
+735%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

A6-5200 1.1
Ultra 7 270K Plus 17.7
+1586%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

A6-5200 52
Ultra 7 270K Plus 429
+730%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

A6-5200 11
Ultra 7 270K Plus 304
+2567%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 11 March 2026
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 125 Watt

A6-5200 has 400% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 270K Plus, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 833% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD A6-5200 and Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A6-5200 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 237 votes

Rate A6-5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 103 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 270K Plus on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A6-5200 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.