Athlon II X4 641 vs A6-4400M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A6-4400M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads
0.65

Athlon II X4 641 outperforms A6-4400M by 131% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-4400M and Athlon II X4 641 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26252039
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.15
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date15 May 2012 (11 years ago)6 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price$95 $16.26

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-4400M and Athlon II X4 641 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache96 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-4400M and Athlon II X4 641 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2FM1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-4400M and Athlon II X4 641. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-4400M and Athlon II X4 641 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-4400M and Athlon II X4 641. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7520Gno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-4400M 0.65
Athlon II X4 641 1.50
+131%

Athlon II X4 641 outperforms A6-4400M by 131% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-4400M 1007
Athlon II X4 641 2313
+130%

Athlon II X4 641 outperforms A6-4400M by 130% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-4400M 320
Athlon II X4 641 374
+16.9%

Athlon II X4 641 outperforms A6-4400M by 17% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-4400M 411
Athlon II X4 641 1256
+206%

Athlon II X4 641 outperforms A6-4400M by 206% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 1.50
Recency 15 May 2012 6 February 2012
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 100 Watt

The Athlon II X4 641 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-4400M in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-4400M is a notebook processor while Athlon II X4 641 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-4400M and Athlon II X4 641, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-4400M
A6-4400M
AMD Athlon II X4 641
Athlon II X4 641

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 169 votes

Rate A6-4400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 138 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 641 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-4400M or Athlon II X4 641, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.