Celeron G540 vs A6-3670K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-3670K and Celeron G540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated2605
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date20 December 2011 (12 years ago)4 September 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$158

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-3670K and Celeron G540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size228 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data69 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-3670K and Celeron G540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM11155
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3670K and Celeron G540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3670K and Celeron G540 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3670K and Celeron G540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6530DIntel HD (Sandy Bridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-3670K and Celeron G540.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 December 2011 4 September 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 65 Watt

A6-3670K has an age advantage of 3 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron G540, on the other hand, has 53.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A6-3670K and Celeron G540. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3670K and Celeron G540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3670K
A6-3670K
Intel Celeron G540
Celeron G540

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 50 votes

Rate A6-3670K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 105 votes

Rate Celeron G540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3670K or Celeron G540, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.