Athlon II X4 641 vs A6-3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-3650
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.33
Athlon II X4 641
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.48
+11.3%

Athlon II X4 641 outperforms A6-3650 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-3650 and Athlon II X4 641 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22642165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.241.37
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date30 June 2011 (13 years ago)6 February 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-3650 and Athlon II X4 641 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size228 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-3650 and Athlon II X4 641 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1FM1
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt100 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3650 and Athlon II X4 641 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3650 and Athlon II X4 641. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6530Dno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-3650 1.33
Athlon II X4 641 1.48
+11.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-3650 2070
Athlon II X4 641 2313
+11.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-3650 295
Athlon II X4 641 374
+26.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-3650 912
Athlon II X4 641 1256
+37.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.33 1.48
Recency 30 June 2011 6 February 2012

Athlon II X4 641 has a 11.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 7 months.

The Athlon II X4 641 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3650 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3650 and Athlon II X4 641, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3650
A6-3650
AMD Athlon II X4 641
Athlon II X4 641

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 73 votes

Rate A6-3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 145 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 641 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3650 or Athlon II X4 641, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.