Ryzen 7 5800H vs A6-3500

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-3500
2011
3 cores / 3 threads, 65 Watt
0.89
Ryzen 7 5800H
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 54 Watt
13.22
+1385%

Ryzen 7 5800H outperforms A6-3500 by a whopping 1385% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-3500 and Ryzen 7 5800H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2553571
Place by popularitynot in top-10076
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency1.3023.17
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date17 August 2011 (13 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-3500 and Ryzen 7 5800H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads316
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.4 GHz
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size228 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A6-3500 and Ryzen 7 5800H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1FP6
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3500 and Ryzen 7 5800H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3500 and Ryzen 7 5800H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3500 and Ryzen 7 5800H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6530DAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-3500 and Ryzen 7 5800H.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-3500 0.89
Ryzen 7 5800H 13.22
+1385%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-3500 1420
Ryzen 7 5800H 20993
+1378%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-3500 262
Ryzen 7 5800H 1762
+573%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-3500 628
Ryzen 7 5800H 7231
+1051%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 13.22
Recency 17 August 2011 12 January 2021
Physical cores 3 8
Threads 3 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 54 Watt

Ryzen 7 5800H has a 1385.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 20.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 5800H is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3500 in performance tests.

Note that A6-3500 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 5800H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3500 and Ryzen 7 5800H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3500
A6-3500
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
Ryzen 7 5800H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 128 votes

Rate A6-3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4224 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5800H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3500 or Ryzen 7 5800H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.