Athlon 64 X2 5600+ vs A6-3420M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-3420M
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.84
+42.4%

A6-3420M outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5600+ by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-3420M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24822703
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.73
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Windsor (2006−2009)
Release date20 December 2011 (12 years ago)December 2006 (17 years ago)
Current price$1578 $61

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-3420M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size228 mm2220 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-3420M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1AM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3420M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G, DDR3(L)-1333 Memory Controllerno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3420M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3420M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6520Gno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-3420M 0.84
+42.4%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 0.59

A6-3420M outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5600+ by 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-3420M 1292
+42.4%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 907

A6-3420M outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5600+ by 42% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-3420M 230
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 278
+20.9%

Athlon 64 X2 5600+ outperforms A6-3420M by 21% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-3420M 593
+15.8%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 512

A6-3420M outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5600+ by 16% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 0.59
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 89 Watt

The A6-3420M is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-3420M is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5600+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3420M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3420M
A6-3420M
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Athlon 64 X2 5600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 179 votes

Rate A6-3420M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 112 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3420M or Athlon 64 X2 5600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.