Ryzen 5 6600H vs A6-3400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-3400M
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.76
Ryzen 5 6600H
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
11.62
+1429%

Ryzen 5 6600H outperforms A6-3400M by a whopping 1429% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 6600H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2710704
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Power efficiency2.0724.59
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 6600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed1.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm6 nm
Die size228 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 6600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 6600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480GMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 6600H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 6600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6520G (400 MHz)AMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 6600H.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A6-3400M 0.76
Ryzen 5 6600H 11.62
+1429%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A6-3400M 1221
Ryzen 5 6600H 18647
+1427%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-3400M 222
Ryzen 5 6600H 1823
+721%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-3400M 567
Ryzen 5 6600H 7512
+1225%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 11.62
Integrated graphics card 0.67 7.08
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

A6-3400M has 28.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 6600H, on the other hand, has a 1428.9% higher aggregate performance score, 956.7% faster integrated GPU, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 433.3% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-3400M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3400M
A6-3400M
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
Ryzen 5 6600H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 179 votes

Rate A6-3400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 913 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 6600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 6600H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.