Celeron 3865U vs A4 PRO-7300B

A4 PRO-7300B A4-4000 A4-4020 A4-6300 A4-7300 A6-6400K A8-6500 A8-6500B A8-6600K A10-6700 A10-6800K Athlon X4 760K
VS
Celeron 1005M Celeron 1007U Celeron 3205U Celeron 3215U Celeron 3755U Celeron 3765U Celeron 3855U Celeron 3865U Celeron 3867U Celeron 3955U Celeron 3965U Celeron 3965Y

Aggregate performance score

A4 PRO-7300B
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.92
+10.8%
Celeron 3865U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.83

A4 PRO-7300B outperforms Celeron 3865U by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

A4 PRO-7300B A4 PRO-7300B
Celeron 3865U Celeron 3865U

Primary details

Comparing A4 PRO-7300B and Celeron 3865U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25172580
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.345.24
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Kaby Lake-U (2017)
Release dateAugust 2014 (10 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

A4 PRO-7300B and Celeron 3865U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache96 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm298.7 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on A4 PRO-7300B and Celeron 3865U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2FCBGA1356,FPBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4 PRO-7300B and Celeron 3865U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+

Security technologies

A4 PRO-7300B and Celeron 3865U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4 PRO-7300B and Celeron 3865U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4 PRO-7300B and Celeron 3865U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare		AMD Radeon HD 8470DIntel HD Graphics 610
Number of pipelines192no data
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data900 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4 PRO-7300B and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A4 PRO-7300B and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4 PRO-7300B and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1112
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4 PRO-7300B and Celeron 3865U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data10

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4 PRO-7300B 0.92
+10.8%
Celeron 3865U 0.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4 PRO-7300B 1458
+10.4%
Celeron 3865U 1321

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.92 0.83
Integrated graphics card 0.97 1.85
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

A4 PRO-7300B has a 10.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron 3865U, on the other hand, has 90.7% faster integrated GPU, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The A4 PRO-7300B is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3865U in performance tests.

Note that A4 PRO-7300B is a desktop processor while Celeron 3865U is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between A4 PRO-7300B and Celeron 3865U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD A4 PRO-7300B
A4 PRO-7300B
Intel Celeron 3865U
Celeron 3865U
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

A4 PRO-7300B A4 PRO 7300B
vs
Pentium J3710 Pentium J3710
Celeron 3865U Celeron 3865U
vs
i5-480M Core i5 480M
A4 PRO-7300B A4 PRO 7300B
vs
Phenom X4 9450e Phenom X4 9450e
Athlon X4 830 Athlon X4 830
vs
Xeon D-1846 Xeon D 1846
Athlon X4 830 Athlon X4 830
vs
Xeon Gold 5520 Xeon Gold 5520
A4 PRO-7300B A4 PRO 7300B
vs
Celeron N2840 Celeron N2840
A4 PRO-7300B A4 PRO 7300B
vs
Celeron G550 Celeron G550
A4 PRO-7300B A4 PRO 7300B
vs
EPYC 7573X EPYC 7573X
A4 PRO-7300B A4 PRO 7300B
vs
i5-13500HX Core i5 13500HX
A6-6420K A6 6420K
vs
Athlon II X2 240 Athlon II X2 240
A6-6420K A6 6420K
vs
Phenom II X4 955 BE Phenom II X4 955 BE
A6-6420K A6 6420K
vs
Sempron 3000+ Sempron 3000+

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 37 votes

Rate A4 PRO-7300B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 116 votes

Rate Celeron 3865U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4 PRO-7300B or Celeron 3865U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.