Atom x7213RE vs A4 PRO-3340B

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4 PRO-3340B
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.04
Atom x7213RE
2024
2 cores / 2 threads, 9 Watt
1.23
+18.3%

Atom x7213RE outperforms A4 PRO-3340B by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4 PRO-3340B and Atom x7213RE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24512321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency3.9412.94
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Amston Lake (2024)
Release date20 December 2014 (10 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$42

Detailed specifications

A4 PRO-3340B and Atom x7213RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A4 PRO-3340B and Atom x7213RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4 PRO-3340B and Atom x7213RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4 PRO-3340B and Atom x7213RE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4 PRO-3340B and Atom x7213RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/DDR3L-1600DDR4, DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon™ HD 8240 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 16EU
iGPU core count2no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4 PRO-3340B and Atom x7213RE integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4 PRO-3340B and Atom x7213RE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4 PRO-3340B and Atom x7213RE.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes89

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4 PRO-3340B 1.04
Atom x7213RE 1.23
+18.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4 PRO-3340B 1645
Atom x7213RE 1957
+19%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 1.23
Recency 20 December 2014 8 April 2024
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 9 Watt

A4 PRO-3340B has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Atom x7213RE, on the other hand, has a 18.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 177.8% lower power consumption.

The Atom x7213RE is our recommended choice as it beats the A4 PRO-3340B in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4 PRO-3340B and Atom x7213RE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4 PRO-3340B
A4 PRO-3340B
Intel Atom x7213RE
Atom x7213RE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate A4 PRO-3340B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7213RE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4 PRO-3340B or Atom x7213RE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.