i7-10870H vs A4 Micro-6400T
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-10870H outperforms A4 Micro-6400T by a whopping 1234% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A4 Micro-6400T and Core i7-10870H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2721 | 841 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD A-Series | no data |
Power efficiency | 14.30 | 19.07 |
Architecture codename | Mullins (2014) | Comet Lake-H (2020) |
Release date | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) | 17 September 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A4 Micro-6400T and Core i7-10870H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 1 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 8 GT/s |
L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 256K (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 12 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on A4 Micro-6400T and Core i7-10870H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FT3b | FCBGA1440 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4 Micro-6400T and Core i7-10870H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | FMA4 | + |
AVX | + | + |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
Security technologies
A4 Micro-6400T and Core i7-10870H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4 Micro-6400T and Core i7-10870H are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4 Micro-6400T and Core i7-10870H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 45.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® Processors |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.2 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A4 Micro-6400T and Core i7-10870H integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | + | + |
HDMI | + | + |
DVI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by A4 Micro-6400T and Core i7-10870H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | no data | + |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2304@30Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096 x 2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096 x 2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A4 Micro-6400T and Core i7-10870H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4 Micro-6400T and Core i7-10870H.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.68 | 9.07 |
Recency | 29 April 2014 | 17 September 2020 |
Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
Threads | 4 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 45 Watt |
A4 Micro-6400T has 1025% lower power consumption.
i7-10870H, on the other hand, has a 1233.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Core i7-10870H is our recommended choice as it beats the A4 Micro-6400T in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between A4 Micro-6400T and Core i7-10870H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.