Xeon 6369P vs A4-9120C

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-9120C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.54
Xeon 6369P
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
18.46
+3319%

Xeon 6369P outperforms A4-9120C by a whopping 3319% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3003373
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data77.06
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency8.6818.73
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date6 January 2019 (6 years ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$606

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

A4-9120C and Xeon 6369P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5.7 GHz
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache160 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size124.5 mm2257 mm2
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A4-9120C and Xeon 6369P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-9120C and Xeon 6369P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

A4-9120C and Xeon 6369P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-9120C and Xeon 6369P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-9120C and Xeon 6369P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory bandwidth14.936 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-9120C and Xeon 6369P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A4-9120C 0.54
Xeon 6369P 18.46
+3319%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A4-9120C 864
Xeon 6369P 29680
+3335%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 18.46
Recency 6 January 2019 24 February 2025
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 95 Watt

A4-9120C has 1483.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6369P, on the other hand, has a 3318.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon 6369P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4-9120C in performance tests.

Be aware that A4-9120C is a notebook processor while Xeon 6369P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-9120C
A4-9120C
Intel Xeon 6369P
Xeon 6369P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 92 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6369P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A4-9120C and Xeon 6369P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.