Xeon 6315P vs A4-9120C
Primary details
Comparing A4-9120C and Xeon 6315P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2917 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Bristol Ridge | no data |
| Power efficiency | 8.57 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 6 January 2019 (6 years ago) | 24 February 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $213 |
Detailed specifications
A4-9120C and Xeon 6315P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | 16 | no data |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 124.5 mm2 | 163 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1200 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on A4-9120C and Xeon 6315P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-9120C and Xeon 6315P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Virtualization, | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
A4-9120C and Xeon 6315P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-9120C and Xeon 6315P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-9120C and Xeon 6315P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 14.936 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-9120C and Xeon 6315P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 January 2019 | 24 February 2025 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 55 Watt |
A4-9120C has 816.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6315P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD A4-9120C and Intel Xeon 6315P. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A4-9120C is a notebook processor while Xeon 6315P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
