EPYC Embedded 3301 vs A4-9120C
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3176 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Bristol Ridge | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 3.59 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 6 January 2019 (7 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $450 |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of A4-9120C and EPYC Embedded 3301: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Multiplier | 16 | 20 |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | 1152 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 124.5 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1200 Million | 9600 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A4-9120C and EPYC Embedded 3301 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | BGA | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-9120C and EPYC Embedded 3301. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Virtualization, | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-9120C and EPYC Embedded 3301 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-9120C and EPYC Embedded 3301. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 14.936 GB/s | 85.33 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 January 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 65 Watt |
A4-9120C has an age advantage of 10 months, and 983% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 3301, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD A4-9120C and AMD EPYC Embedded 3301. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A4-9120C is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 3301 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
