EPYC Embedded 3301 vs Atom C3958

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2066not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.17no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel AtomAMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency3.05no data
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date15 August 2017 (8 years ago)21 February 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449$450

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom C3958 and EPYC Embedded 3301 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Multiplier2020
L1 cache896 KB1152 KB
L2 cache16 MB6 MB
L3 cache16 MB32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature83 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9600 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3958 and EPYC Embedded 3301 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1310no data
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3958 and EPYC Embedded 3301. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Atom C3958 and EPYC Embedded 3301 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3958 and EPYC Embedded 3301 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3958 and EPYC Embedded 3301. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size256 GB1 TiB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3958 and EPYC Embedded 3301.

PCIe version3no data
PCI Express lanes16no data
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 21 February 2018
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 65 Watt

Atom C3958 has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 109.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 3301, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months.

We couldn't decide between Intel Atom C3958 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3301. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3958
Atom C3958
AMD EPYC Embedded 3301
EPYC Embedded 3301

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Atom C3958 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 3301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3958 and EPYC Embedded 3301, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.