Core i3-2375M vs A4-9120

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A4-9120
2017
2 cores / 2 threads
0.79
+36.2%

A4-9120 outperforms Core i3-2375M by a substantial 36% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-9120 and Core i3-2375M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25042682
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol RidgeIntel Core i3
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 June 2017 (6 years ago)3 February 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$250
Current price$253 $201 (0.8x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

A4-9120 and Core i3-2375M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache160 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data3 MB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size124.5 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million624 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A4-9120 and Core i3-2375M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-9120 and Core i3-2375M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,Intel® AVX
AES-NIno data-
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A4-9120 and Core i3-2375M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-9120 and Core i3-2375M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-9120 and Core i3-2375M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)Intel HD Graphics 3000
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-9120 and Core i3-2375M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-9120 and Core i3-2375M.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-9120 0.79
+36.2%
i3-2375M 0.58

A4-9120 outperforms Core i3-2375M by 36% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A4-9120 1219
+35.4%
i3-2375M 900

A4-9120 outperforms Core i3-2375M by 35% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 0.58
Integrated graphics card 1.03 0.66
Recency 1 June 2017 3 February 2013
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 17 Watt

The A4-9120 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2375M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-9120 and Core i3-2375M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-9120
A4-9120
Intel Core i3-2375M
Core i3-2375M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 469 votes

Rate A4-9120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 14 votes

Rate Core i3-2375M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-9120 or Core i3-2375M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.