Athlon II X2 240 vs A4-9120

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-9120
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.77
+16.7%
Athlon II X2 240
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.66

A4-9120 outperforms Athlon II X2 240 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-9120 and Athlon II X2 240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26552759
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.28
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesBristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency4.860.96
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date1 June 2017 (7 years ago)23 July 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$35

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A4-9120 and Athlon II X2 240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache160 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size124.5 mm2117 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-9120 and Athlon II X2 240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAAM3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-9120 and Athlon II X2 240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-9120 and Athlon II X2 240 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-9120 and Athlon II X2 240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-9120 and Athlon II X2 240.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-9120 0.77
+16.7%
Athlon II X2 240 0.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-9120 1217
+16.6%
Athlon II X2 240 1044

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 0.66
Recency 1 June 2017 23 July 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

A4-9120 has a 16.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The A4-9120 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 240 in performance tests.

Be aware that A4-9120 is a notebook processor while Athlon II X2 240 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-9120 and Athlon II X2 240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-9120
A4-9120
AMD Athlon II X2 240
Athlon II X2 240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 502 votes

Rate A4-9120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 385 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-9120 or Athlon II X2 240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.