Ultra 9 295HX vs A4-7300
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2821 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 0.57 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Richland (2013−2014) | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) |
| Release date | August 2014 (11 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
A4-7300 and Core Ultra 9 295HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | no data |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,303 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on A4-7300 and Core Ultra 9 295HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FM2 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-7300 and Core Ultra 9 295HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-7300 and Core Ultra 9 295HX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-7300 and Core Ultra 9 295HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 8470D | no data |
| จำนวนพาธไลน์ | 192 | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A4-7300 and Core Ultra 9 295HX integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A4-7300 and Core Ultra 9 295HX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 11 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-7300 and Core Ultra 9 295HX.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 24 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
Ultra 9 295HX has 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and 18% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD A4-7300 and Intel Core Ultra 9 295HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that A4-7300 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 9 295HX is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
