Xeon 6980P vs A4-6320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-6320
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.90
Xeon 6980P
2024
128 cores / 256 threads, 500 Watt
43.48
+4731%

Xeon 6980P outperforms A4-6320 by a whopping 4731% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking289987
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.573.57
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Granite Rapids (2024−2026)
Release dateDecember 2013 (12 years ago)24 September 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of A4-6320 and Xeon 6980P: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)128
Threads2256
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache96 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data504 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C80 °C
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A4-6320 and Xeon 6980P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFM2FCLGA7529
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6320 and Xeon 6980P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A4-6320 and Xeon 6980P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6320 and Xeon 6980P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6320 and Xeon 6980P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR5(6400MT/s)MRDIMM(8800MT/s)
Maximum memory sizeno data3 TB
Max memory channels212
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon™ HD 8370DN/A
จำนวนพาธไลน์128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-6320 and Xeon 6980P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-6320 and Xeon 6980P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6320 and Xeon 6980P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A4-6320 0.90
Xeon 6980P 43.48
+4731%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A4-6320 1532
Samples: 36
Xeon 6980P 74324
+4751%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.90 43.48
Physical cores 2 128
Threads 2 256
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 500 Watt

A4-6320 has 669% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6980P, on the other hand, has a 4731% higher aggregate performance score, and 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6980P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4-6320 in performance tests.

Note that A4-6320 is a desktop processor while Xeon 6980P is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate A4-6320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 78 votes

Rate Xeon 6980P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A4-6320 and Xeon 6980P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.