Celeron G530 vs A4-6320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-6320
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.96
+35.2%
Celeron G530
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.71

A4-6320 outperforms Celeron G530 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-6320 and Celeron G530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25032712
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.401.03
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateDecember 2013 (11 years ago)4 September 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A4-6320 and Celeron G530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache96 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C69 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on A4-6320 and Celeron G530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6320 and Celeron G530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

A4-6320 and Celeron G530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6320 and Celeron G530 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6320 and Celeron G530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon™ HD 8370DIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
จำนวนพาธไลน์128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-6320 and Celeron G530 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-6320 and Celeron G530 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6320 and Celeron G530.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-6320 0.96
+35.2%
Celeron G530 0.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-6320 1530
+35.9%
Celeron G530 1126

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 0.71

A4-6320 has a 35.2% higher aggregate performance score.

The A4-6320 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G530 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6320 and Celeron G530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-6320
A4-6320
Intel Celeron G530
Celeron G530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate A4-6320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 204 votes

Rate Celeron G530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-6320 or Celeron G530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.