A4-6300 vs A4-6320

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-6320
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.96
+6.7%
A4-6300
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.90

A4-6320 outperforms A4-6300 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-6320 and A4-6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24852533
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.401.31
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Richland (2013−2014)
Release dateDecember 2013 (10 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-6320 and A4-6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache96 KB96 KB
L2 cache1024 KB1024 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C70 °C
Number of transistors1,303 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on A4-6320 and A4-6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6320 and A4-6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX+AVX
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6320 and A4-6300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6320 and A4-6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3-1600
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon™ HD 8370DAMD Radeon™ HD 8370D
Number of pipelines128128
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-6320 and A4-6300 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-6320 and A4-6300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11DirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6320 and A4-6300.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-6320 0.96
+6.7%
A4-6300 0.90

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-6320 1530
+7.3%
A4-6300 1426

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 0.90

A4-6320 has a 6.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A4-6320 and A4-6300.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6320 and A4-6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-6320
A4-6320
AMD A4-6300
A4-6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate A4-6320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 281 vote

Rate A4-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-6320 or A4-6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.