AMD A4-6250J: specs and benchmarks
Aggregate performance score
A4-6250J provides poor benchmark performance at 1.04% of a leader's which is a 192-core EPYC 9965.
Contents
Summary
AMD started A4-6250J sales 29 April 2014. This is a Beema architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, and is based on 28 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2000 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket FT3 processor with a TDP of 25 Watt. It supports DDR3 memory.
Primary details
A4-6250J processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
| Place in the ranking | 2623 | |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | |
| Power efficiency | 1.61 | of 100.00 (Apple M4 (8 cores)) |
| Designer | AMD | |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | |
| Architecture codename | Beema (2014) | |
| Release date | 29 April 2014 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | |
| Threads | 4 | |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | of 6.2 GHz (Core i9-14900KS) |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | of 80 KB (EPYC 9965) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | of 2 MB (Xeon 6980P) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | of 3 nm (EPYC 9965) |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | |
| Number of transistors | 930 million | of 135,240 million (EPYC 9684X) |
| 64 bit support | + |
Compatibility
Information on A4-6250J compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8454H) |
| Socket | FT3 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | of 500 Watt (EPYC 9965) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by A4-6250J. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | |
| AVX | + |
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
| AMD-V | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A4-6250J's memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of a GPU integrated into A4-6250J.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon R3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | of 5.0 (EPYC 9965) |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of A4-6250J. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Send your test results of A4-6250J.
Intel equivalent
According to our data, the closest Intel alternative to A4-6250J is Pentium G3240T, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 2 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest Intel rivals to A4-6250J:
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
