Ryzen 9 5900H vs A4-6210

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-6210
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.98
Ryzen 9 5900H
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
13.43
+1270%

Ryzen 9 5900H outperforms A4-6210 by a whopping 1270% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-6210 and Ryzen 9 5900H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2503580
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency5.9627.21
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)7 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-6210 and Ryzen 9 5900H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cache2048 KB4 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-6210 and Ryzen 9 5900H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT3bFP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6210 and Ryzen 9 5900H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6210 and Ryzen 9 5900H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6210 and Ryzen 9 5900H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1599no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R3 GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-6210 and Ryzen 9 5900H integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-6210 and Ryzen 9 5900H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6210 and Ryzen 9 5900H.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-6210 0.98
Ryzen 9 5900H 13.43
+1270%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-6210 1493
Ryzen 9 5900H 20557
+1277%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.98 13.43
Recency 29 April 2014 7 January 2021
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

A4-6210 has 200% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 5900H, on the other hand, has a 1270.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 5900H is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-6210 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6210 and Ryzen 9 5900H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-6210
A4-6210
AMD Ryzen 9 5900H
Ryzen 9 5900H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 152 votes

Rate A4-6210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 23 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-6210 or Ryzen 9 5900H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.