Athlon Gold 7220U vs A4-6210

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-6210
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.94
Athlon Gold 7220U
2022
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.00
+219%

Athlon Gold 7220U outperforms A4-6210 by a whopping 219% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-6210 and Athlon Gold 7220U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25061637
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency5.9118.85
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-6210 and Athlon Gold 7220U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data100 mm2
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A4-6210 and Athlon Gold 7220U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bFP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6210 and Athlon Gold 7220U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6210 and Athlon Gold 7220U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6210 and Athlon Gold 7220U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1599DDR5 Dual-channel
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R3 GraphicsAMD Radeon 610M
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-6210 and Athlon Gold 7220U integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-6210 and Athlon Gold 7220U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6210 and Athlon Gold 7220U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-6210 0.94
Athlon Gold 7220U 3.00
+219%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-6210 1493
Athlon Gold 7220U 4740
+217%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A4-6210 189
Athlon Gold 7220U 1014
+437%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A4-6210 532
Athlon Gold 7220U 2120
+298%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.94 3.00
Recency 29 April 2014 20 September 2022
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

A4-6210 has 100% more physical cores.

Athlon Gold 7220U, on the other hand, has a 219.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Athlon Gold 7220U is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-6210 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6210 and Athlon Gold 7220U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-6210
A4-6210
AMD Athlon Gold 7220U
Athlon Gold 7220U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 152 votes

Rate A4-6210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 97 votes

Rate Athlon Gold 7220U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-6210 or Athlon Gold 7220U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.